Review: A DISSECTION OF MURDER by Felicity Young

Australian/NZ Cover

Historical crime fiction featuring strong female characters in roles their real-world counterparts might not have had the opportunity to participate in have become quite popular in recent years. If this first instalment of a new series in this sub genre is anything to go by then Western Australian author Felicity Young’s name will soon be being mentioned in the same conversations and lists as genre luminaries like Ariana Franklin and Elizabeth Peters. At least this will be the case in my little corner of the universe.

The book is set in the early 1900’s in England and introduces Dody McCleland, a young woman of means who has trained to become a doctor but because very few positions in the medical field are open to women she has had to make autopsy surgery her speciality. Even so she is struggling to secure a full time job in the field and volunteers her services doing ward rounds at a local hospital to pass time and maintain her skills. She does however receive some requests for her specialist services from the authorities but on one such occasion she is forced to refuse to perform the autopsy because the victim is a friend of her sister Florence. The woman died during a march by suffragettes and there is speculation that she was beaten by the police but when Dody withdraws from the autopsy a less qualified (and more alcoholic) doctor is bought in to prepare a report which obfuscates any possible role the police might have had in the woman’s death. Neither Dody nor her sister are impressed with this outcome and they embark on investigations of their own. Inspector Matthew Pike of the police is willing to weed out corruption if it exists within the ranks but he is stymied by a strained relationship with his superiors and so must make some unlikely alliances. He is not exactly a supporter of the women’s suffrage movement either so this provides for some extra tension.

I loved meeting Dody McCleland. Although she is a strong woman fighting to be taken seriously in a male-dominated profession she isn’t as ardent or extreme in her behaviour as might be expected for this kind of book. While supporting the goals of the suffrage movement she leaves the militant activity of the WSPU* to her younger sister. She is able to see things from the point of view of the police as well as the activists and has a range of interests including advancing her career and learning all she can about the medical field. Although it’s only the first book in which she appears Dody felt more well-rounded to me than heroines of some similar stories who are often an ‘all or nothing’ kind of character with a very singular focus. Her sister provides a nice contrast to Dody but though more militant there are nuances to Florence’s character too and she does not always behave as one might expect of the impetuous younger sister.

Matthew Pike is an equally intriguing and well-rounded character who I will enjoy getting to know in what I hope are many future instalments of this series. His sense of ethics has gotten him into strife more than once and is partially responsible for his almost impecunious state (though Young teases out the fact that then as now this also has a lot to do with the relatively paltry sum paid to the police given all that society expects of them). Although he is more concerned with propriety than the McCleland sisters he proves to be willing to bend the rules if situations demand it and he manages to keep his judgemental propensities in check most of the time.

US Cover (and UK too I think)

The setting for this novel is fascinating, not least because the historically accurate information included was incorporated in a very natural way. This did not diminish the impact of some aspects of the backdrop though, including the treatment of the women who went to prison due to their activities in the suffrage movement. The hunger strikes that many women prisoners embarked on with the aim of achieving equality of treatment for the suffragette prisoners regardless of their social class is a known fact but its depiction in this narrative, including the force-feeding of the hunger striking prisoners, really brings home the barbarism of the treatment and the bravery of the women who endured it. Other events from the period, including the hanging of Hawley Crippen which Dody witnesses as part of her official duties, lend a really authentic feel to the book.

Finally there is the mystery itself which, although considered last here is by no means an insignificant part of this novel. Figuring out who killed Lady Catherine Cartwright requires the combined efforts of all the main characters and, of course, doesn’t happen before several wrong turns are taken by all and sundry. While I didn’t see the resolution coming until just before the big reveal it did fit in with the events that preceded it and so provided a very satisfactory completion to the story.

I was quite beguiled by the mixture of compelling fictional characters, well-researched sense of time and place and inclusion of real figures from history in minor roles that were blended seamlessly in A DISSECTION OF MURDER. If you are even a little bit interested in historical crime fiction I highly recommend this novel.

*Women’s Social and Political Union 

Note: this book is being published in the US (with UK distribution) in June 2012 but under the name THE ANATOMY OF DEATH 

A DISSECTION OF MURDER has been reviewed at Aust Crime Fiction and Book’d Out

I am counting this as the sixth book towards completing the Australian Women Writers Challenge for this year

My rating: 4.5/5 stars (rating scale is explained here)
Author website:
Publisher: Harper Collins [2012]
ISBN: 9780732293680
Length: 279 pages
Format: Trade Paperback
Source: I bought it
Creative Commons Licence
This work by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

14 thoughts on “Review: A DISSECTION OF MURDER by Felicity Young

  1. What a tempting review, Bernadette! Thanks. I do like historical mysteries, especially where the context is done accurately and where the protagonist makes sense given that context. This one really has my attention, so I’m glad you enjoyed it.


  2. I very much enjoyed this title as well and I’m looking forward to the next one!


  3. Pingback: An update, and some gushing, on the Australian Women Writers challenge 2012 | Reactions to Reading

  4. This review reminds me of the imprisonment of women suffragists in the U.S., who went on hunger strikes and were brutally force-fed. Alice Paul, Lucy Burns and other nameless women were incredibly brave, stood in front of the White House and were physically and verbally attacked and then jailed. A good movie with Hilary Swank and Frances O’Connor, called Iron-Jawed Angels, portrays this movement and their roles. It was an eye-opener for me as I hadn’t known about much of their movement and the abuse they suffered. A prison psychiatrist tried to trap Alice Paul after she had been put in solitary confinement, as a result of the hunger strike, and she’d been tortured and force-fed. The government wanted to put her away for the rest of her life. But she never buckled and stayed strong. It’s quite a movie.
    This looks like a good book, but my TBR mountain range has to be managed somehow.


    • I did watch that movie fairly recently Kathy and agree it was excellent. I have quite an interest in the suffrage movements around the world partly because I was an archivist for the government archives for some years and our state when it was a colony of Britain was the second place in the world to give women the vote in 1894 (New Zealand was first but we took the honour for not only giving the right to vote but also the right to stand as a candidate). In 1994 we held an exhibition about the first hundred years of women’s voting and I helped put the exhibition together.


  5. That’s quite interesting. I didn’t know that. So few people know the real struggle it took to get the right to vote for women and to run as candidates, too. (African-American people, as you know, had to have the Civil Rights Movement to get the 1965 Voting Act, which eliminated many obstacles to voter registration and voting and also to run for office.) Yes, voting, which we take for granted, was won hard over here. In England, too, women had a tough battle. Alice Paul and Lucy Burns were in England first, I believe, working with the suffragists and then came here, with some of the same tactics.
    Glad you saw that movie. It’s excellent, as you say, the cast was stellar.
    Alice Paul stayed active for decades, ran an organization. (A friend of mine net her years ago) and Lucy Burns retired, became religious and took care of a relative. That always makes me sad to think about as I remember her as such a fighter in the movie.


  6. Pingback: Books of the Month – April 2012 | Reactions to Reading

  7. Pingback: Review: A DISSECTION OF MURDER, Felicity Young | Fair Dinkum Crime

  8. Pingback: AWW 2012 review: A Dissection of Murder (Felicity Young) « The Banana Lounge

  9. Pingback: 2012 – Wrapping up the Australian Women Writers Challenge | Reactions to Reading

  10. Pingback: 2012 – Wrapping up the Australian Women Writers Challenge | Reactions to Reading

  11. Pingback: 2012: Virtual Travelling | Reactions to Reading

  12. Pingback: Review: ANTIDOTE TO MURDER by Felicity Young | Fair Dinkum Crime

Comments are closed.